Control your own destiny or something else will.
For a spending policy to satisfy all constituents under all market
conditions, its basic structure is critical. The most common spending
formulas express the annual spend as some percentage of assets, usually
averaged over 24- to 36-months. Although this makes intuitive sense,
it can backfire at the worst possible times.
For example, consider a fund which has suffered a sharp decline of 20%
during a single quarter. If the subsequent spending calculation is based
on mostly pre-decline asset values, the result can be a spending amount
that is inappropriately high compared to current market value - in this case,
it might approach 10% of the fund value. This overspend extends and amplifies
the negative effect of the bad performance and possibly inflicts permanent
harm on the fund.
Another structural issue with spending formulas is their year to year volatility,
which can make annual budgeting more difficult. Ideally, a spending policy would
be stable and predictable to facilitate longer range planning and budgeting,
yet still retain a link to the real returns to share any incremental wealth
created to the current generation.
SimMetric allows you to build and model a wide variety of spending formulas that
address these structural problems. You can incorporate lagging, minimums and asset
averaging and other types of formulas.
|